[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#788844: marked as done (RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 -- utilities for command line econometrics [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:24:53 +0000
with message-id <E1ZPCM9-0008Rt-OK@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 -- utilities for command line econometrics [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #788844,
regarding RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 -- utilities for command line econometrics [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
788844: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788844
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gbutils"

 * Package name    : gbutils
   Version         : 5.6.6-1
   Upstream Author : Giulio Bottazzi
 * URL             : http://cafed.sssup.it/software/gbutils/gbutils.html
 * License         : GPL-2+
   Section         : science

It builds those binary packages:

  gbutils    - utilities for command line econometrics

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/gbutils


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

dget -x \
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gbutils/gbutils_5.6.6-1.dsc

or the packaging git repository with

git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/gbutils.git


Regards,

Pietro Battiston

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package gbutils has been removed from mentors.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: