[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#794915: marked as done (RFS: compute/0.4-1 [ITP])



Your message dated Sat, 8 Aug 2015 21:00:06 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <332569384.1390613.1439067606329.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#794915: revised source package uploaded to mentors
has caused the Debian Bug report #794915,
regarding RFS: compute/0.4-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
794915: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "compute"

* Package name    : compute
  Version         : 0.4-1
  Upstream Author : Kyle Lutz <kyle.r.lutz@gmail.com>
* URL             : https://github.com/boostorg/compute
* License         : Boost Software License 1.0
  Section         : science

It builds those binary packages:

libcompute-dev - cross-platform C++ library for GPU computing

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/compute

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/compute/compute_0.4-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release. (Closes: #794649)

Best regards,
Ghislain Vaillant

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Ghislain

>No problem, I am the one supposed to get that right. I did not realize 

>that licensecheck ignores *.cmake files by default.


that license checks are sooo boring, I always try to avoid them and leave them 

at the end of the review :)

Unfortunately/Fortunately they are so important for Debian, so we have to get
used to them, and try to achieve the best copyright file possible
(specially because the package might be rejected by ftpmasters if some bits are not
in place ;) )
(I missed that one too in my previous reviews, so you are not the only one)

>Actually both cmake/FindTBB.cmake and cmake/FindEigen.cmake had 
>different copyright information. They have been added to d/copyright.

>

That check saved me and you from another mail trip :)


>I have uploaded another version. Hopefully, it will be the one.

I did some final checks, and everything was looking good.

So while writing this mail I did the build&sign&upload on ftp-masters, that
will appear in a few hours on the NEW [1] queue, where ftpmasters will review it
and if everything is good the package will eventually go on unstable.

Thanks for your contribution to Debian!


[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

cheers,

Gianfranco

--- End Message ---

Reply to: