HI Jörg, On Sa 18 Apr 2015 13:32:36 CEST, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
Hi, bamf isn't orphaned[1] now. So I close this bug. For some times my changes are available at[2]. CU Jörg [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779565 [2] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bamf/bamf_0.2.118-1.1.dsc
0.2.118 is quite an ancient version. I had contacted bamf upstream and they just released 0.5.1.
I would like to upload this 0.5.1(-1) version to experimental soon and will take a look at the debdiff between
0.2.118-1 and 0.2.118-1.1 as well.Would you like to become the maintainer of bamf in Debian? Do I get this right? Would it be ok for you to maintain bamf in the context of the MATE packaging team (or at least of the MATE team in the Uploaders: field)?
As bamf is a hard-dependency of plank (and has no other heavy dependency interactions, yet, in Debian), I would love to see a similar workflow for both packages. Also I would like to be involved, as it needs a DD or DM to upload to the Debian archive. As I haven't found your mail address in neither of the keyrings (DD keyring / DM keyring), I presume you require a sponsor for your uploads to Debian (which have been many, as I see on your DDPO page [1]).
Please get back to me before the coming week, so we can deal out how to continue with bamf maintenance in Debian. Don't close this bug until we have come to a good conclusion on this. Thanks.
Mike [1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian@jff-webhosting.net -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
Attachment:
pgpswIuDN3Yw7.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur