> Or they could keep the files from Nokia under LGPL2.1, and use > GPL3+openssl exception for the rest of the files. Given that they have > proper headers, I don't see a problem with that, although I would > mention that in the readme. But what license would the work as a whole be distributed as, then? > PS: I don't see the OpenSSL exception anywhere there. It's in the debian directory, but I agree that it could be made more clear.
Attachment:
pgpBDJrbeWwiG.pgp
Description: PGP signature