[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#804100: RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.14.0-1~debian [ITP]



Many thanks Gianfranco,

  to answer your questions

1. python3 - yes I should include this as a dependency - you are correct rhythmbox does have a dependency - but belt-and-braces
2. When the topic of changing the interface for rhythmbox came up on a bugzilla report, the rhythmbox maintainer dismissed very quickly the approach of using a python3 plugin.  Thus I havent attempted to upstream this

 - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735648

With regards to the lintian report:

1.  W: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar source: build-depends-on-python-dev-with-no-arch-any

There is no reason for the package to have a build-depends on python3-dev so I'll remove this.

2. P: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature

No idea on this - dont think GitHub provides a means to gpg-signature the tar.gz tag file

3. P: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar: no-upstream-changelog

Think this means I need to change my source and thus bump the version. If you don't mind I would like to bump this into a future version of the plugin.

4. I: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar: capitalization-error-in-description Gnome GNOME

Doh! - yes, quite correct - I'll change all references for Gnome to GNOME in the description

5. W: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar: extra-license-file usr/lib/rhythmbox/plugins/alternative-toolbar/LICENSE

I'm not sure how to do this - I thought of using a debian/rules override_dh_auto_install but this doesnt seem to be working.  If you have any thoughts on this I would be very grateful - for the moment I've created a unix-and-linux stackexchange question and I hope someone can answer:

 - http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/250683/how-to-remove-a-license-file-when-debian-packaging-using-autotools-automake#250683

thanks

David

 - 

On 21 December 2015 at 09:20, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it> wrote:
Hi,



the package looks really nice now!

however there still are some minor issues here
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.15.0-1/lintian

can you please address them? the package works in both debian and ubuntu.

I have a few questions:
1) isn't python3 a runtime dependency? (not a problem, because seems that rhythmbox already depends on it)
2) why didn't you upstream the plugin into the rhythmbox-plugins package?
https://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rhythmbox.html

thanks,

Gianfranco


Reply to: