[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#807584: marked as done (RFS: clfft/2.8-3)



Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:22:10 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <18093616.527833.1449760930533.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#807584: RFS: clfft/2.8-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #807584,
regarding RFS: clfft/2.8-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
807584: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807584
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clfft"

* Package name    : clfft
  Version         : 2.8-3
  Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
* URL             : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clFFT
* License         : Apache version 2
  Section         : science

It builds those binary packages:

  libclfft-bin - OpenCL FFT library (executables)
  libclfft-dev - OpenCL FFT library (development files)
  libclfft-doc - OpenCL FFT library (documentation)
  libclfft2  - OpenCL FFT library (shared library)
  libclfft2-dbg - OpenCL FFT library (debugging symbols)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/clfft

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clfft/clfft_2.8-3.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * Add patch enabling support for kFreeBSD.

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, sponsored, but please note:

-#elif defined(__FreeBSD__)
+#elif defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__)


this isn't a good patch for upstream (I guess, but I'm not a porter)

maybe something like
+#elif defined(__FreeBSD__) or defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__)




might be better suitable for upstream inclusion.

Anyway, please debug and check this!

cheers,

G.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: