Re: general question about quilt patch handling
Werner Detter <werner@aloah-from-hell.de> writes:
>> For example, if 3.patch has not been forwarded upstream yet, then I
>> would definitely modify it (instead of creating a new patch).
>
> I've modified 3.patch - in the course of the modification one line has
> been deleted (perl "use" statement) as it's not needed anymore.
> Therefore some subsequent patches now complain, e.g.
>
> Applying patch 4.patch
> patching file xxx
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 482 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 2211 (offset -1 lines).
>
> Subsequent patches apply successfully but I'd like to get rid of
> those messages. What is the recommendation here?
Have you got any reason not to simply refresh your patches?
Something like: quilt pop -a; while quilt push; do quilt refresh; done
--
Regards,
Feri.
Reply to: