Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK
Hi, so please start again from my work and try to fix it :)
it should be easier if libraries are in triplet, but be aware that the libraries uses probably commo
names, so you might need to rename some of them
(try with apt-file if other packages are using the same names)
(let me know when you have something to look at again)
cheers,
G.
--------------------------------------------
Mer 25/11/15, Jörn Schönyan <joern.schoenyan@web.de> ha scritto:
Oggetto: Re: Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK
A: "Gianfranco Costamagna" <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it>
Cc: 797888-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Data: Mercoledì 25 novembre 2015, 19:49
On Mittwoch, 25. November
2015 14:13:24 CET, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, I did some digging into this package,
however I haven't
> been able to
produce a working packaging
Hi!
> I'm attaching the debian tarball to
this email, feel free to
> start from
there.
>
> Howevere I
see a real issue.
>
>
you are installing libraries into usr/bin/triplet/panda3d
> and you are providing binaries linking
them into usr/bin
>
>
>
>
so I don't see how you can use them without poisoning
> ld.so.conf or setting RPATH.
>
> for sure I would not
sponsor a package that sets stuff inside
> /etc/ld.so.conf.d/
>
>
> and is not in the
libc* packages.
>
>
sorry but this is a showstopper, please ask upstream how to
> proceed, or start from my work and
continue it
> I already spent many days
in this packaging, and I can't give
> it more time, specially because of the
custom build system
>
> also RPATH might be forbidden in Debian
>
rdb from upstream (the
main developer) suggests [1] to install to
/usr/lib/triplet/, this could involve patching
installpanda.py (I will look
into this the
next days). He opposes using RPATH, too.
Btw, he recommends calling the package
panda3d1.9 instead of panda3d1.9.x -
binary
compatibility is guaranteed :D
[1] http://www.panda3d.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=18404
>
> cheers,
>
> G.
Have a nice day, Jörn
Reply to: