[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#805393: Subject: RFS: liblastfm/1.0.9-1 [ITA]



Hi,

yes, the question actually is why one is liblastfm1 and the other liblastfm5-1(I mean the -1, but it isn't a real problem I guess)

On Qt4 build the library so-name is liblastfm.so.1 and the package scheme is: <NAME><Version> → liblastfm1
For the Qt5 build the name is liblastfm5.so.1 and the scheme is now <NAME><QT-Suffix>-<Verstion> → liblastfm5-1
I think this happens because the name ends with a number and so lintian wants to have a seperator between name and version.

Shell I change the package name to liblastfm-qt5-1 and ignore the lintian warning?

I can do the builds for you, just tell me whenever you are ready.

if you want you can do something like
pbuilder-dist sid ARCH create
and
pbuilder-dist sid ARCH build file.dsc


Oh cool, I'm using pbuilder-dist, too. To create packages easier for different ubuntu and debian versions. I thought you know a better solution than using pbuilder-dist + QEMU.

Ok, I've tested the build under arm64, armel, armhf, mipsel, mips. And only a few optional symbols on liblastfm-fingerprint5-1.symbol were obsolete. I've uploaded a new version to mentors.debian.net

Could you please build the package for me and check if the symbols are ok, or not?

Cheers,
 Stefan

Reply to: