Bug#787148: gambatte review
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi Sérgio!
ping, if you are still interested, please answer and fix the above :)
(or ask about how to fix it)
otherwise I'll close the RFS and unassign myself :)
cheers,
G.
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
<costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it> wrote:
> Hi Sérgio,
>
>
>
>>> what about maintaining it under Debian Games Team?
>>
>> What should I do? Send a message to the mailing list? With all my
>> packages?
>
>
> just join the Games Team, set it as uploader or maintainer and live
> happy.
>
> I guess all the packages that are games should live under that
> pkg-games umbrella (like e.g. hedgewars, a game I comaintain
> there)
>
> but this isn't mandatory of course
>
>
>> Upstream does not answer people for some months...
>
>
> bad upstream is bad :(
>
>>> 3) section Games maybe? (that one applies also to
>>> mupen64plus-qt)
>>
>> otherosfs is not better? I'll have to change stuff to /usr/games/
>> then...
>
>
> well, what is the otherosfs pourpose? sorry, I have never heard
> about it :)
>
>
>> Changed to optional
>
>
> wonderful
>
>> There's a problem with Qt frontend on ARM, this is why there's
>> only the sdl port to ARM.
>
>
> ok, but no problem with armel and arm64? only armhf has issues?
>
>
>> Let's wait upstream merge the makefile PR, to mess with it.
>
>
> ok
>
>> changed to 0.5.0~git20150322-1, like I said, upstream is
>> vanished.
>
>
> fine :)
>
>
>
> so if you can reply/fix the above I'll continue the review and
> hopefully sponsor the package :)
>
> (I guess I still need to play a little bit with a built binary)
>
> cheers,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=P+vf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: