[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#803307: RFS: clblas/2.8-2 [RC]




>I am still confused though. The involuntary patching of the source 
>happened in the Debian packaging branch after merging the source for 
>v2.8. So, I still have the original upstream source for v2.8 untouched 
>in the pristine-tar branch.
>
>So I am guessing this solution would not work, would it?


dak don't care about your branch, it it cares about the md5 and sha256 checksum
of the orig tarball and the debian tarballs, nothing more.

so your git can be correct now, but dak "stored" another tarball hash.

>Sounds like the least painful option, don't you think? I guess I just 
>need to create a fake v2.8+ds1 tag, update the current changelog entry 
>to 2.8+ds1-1 and re-submit ?


yes, just be sure that the orig tarball is called differently, and that
it has the same md5sum as the tarball you get with uscan.

cheers,

G.


Reply to: