Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]
On 26.10.2015 10:47, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> what do you need me to do?
> As the poster of RFS do I need to take action?
>
> Thanks
> Cornelius
>
> Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2015, 22:00 +0100 schrieb Daniel Stender:
>> My idea with this would be, close the RFS for now, then file RFP and
>> wishlist-please-update bugs with blocks against the ITP as a todo list.
>>
>> Needs some afforestation, when everything is available privacyidea goes into
>> NEW. Like said, I think I've seen that most of the packages are group maintained
>> (with Python group in Maintainers field), that's good.
>>
>> Daniel
Yes, I didn't closed it because it's not my bug, that should do the reporter.
I've made a "afforestation" before for Prospector, there were ... I think ... more
than ten things outdated or not available. I'm going to help with uploads in the groups,
and I would really see Privacyidea in Debian at the year's turn (depends on how long
the missing packages are going to be in NEW), for Debian 9 there's nothing against it.
I'm on it (owner of the ITP bug)!
Best,
Daniel
--
4096R/DF5182C8
46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8
LPI certified Linux admin (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4)
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
Reply to: