Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK

[Jörn Schönyan <joern.schoenyan@web.de>]

On Mittwoch, 14. Oktober 2015 17:03:45 CEST, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > You realized that these files aren't symlinks but libraries? So really 
> > don't think this would be correct. One example:
> So I guess you should create the library and symlink the so file?
> (I mean, a library and a library-dev with the so symlinked)
>
> dynamic shared libraries without soname are so painful
> (unless they are kept private, and I don't remember the package right now)
I know what you mean: that will make it impossible to install different 
versions of libpanda3d. But I have no clue at all what should be symlinked.
> I still don't understand, even after looking at the package
> sed 's/@DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH@/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/g' 
> debian/libpanda3d$(P3DVER).links.in > 
> debian/panda3d$(P3DVER).links
>
>
> why a libpanda3d*.links.in becomes a panda3d*.links?
Oops, that was an mistake while renaming panda3d1.9.0 to libpanda3d1.9.0 as 
requested.
> at the end the result is somewhat correct, but I presume there 
> are some packaging issues,
> e.g. the libpanda3d1.9.0 package contains .so files, but they 
> are just links.
I will rebuild and check that.
> cheers,
>
> G.
Best regards