[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#801198: RFS: smplayer/15.9.0~ds0-1



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smplayer"

 * Package name    : smplayer
   Version         : 15.9.0~ds0-1
   Upstream Author : Ricardo Villalba <rvm@escomposlinux.org>
 * URL             : http://smplayer.sourceforge.net/
 * License         : GPL-2+
   Section         : video

It builds those binary packages:

 smplayer   - complete front-end for MPlayer, MPlayer2 and MPV
smplayer-l10n - complete front-end for MPlayer and MPlayer2 - translation files

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/smplayer

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smplayer/smplayer_15.9.0~ds0-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  [ Mateusz Łukasik ]
  * New upstream release. (Closes: #770357, #798961, #799040, #800533,
    LP: #1390937)
    - Build with QT5.
  * Bump standards version to 3.9.6. (no changes needed)
  * Patch working: (thanks Alf Gaida <agaida@siduction.org>)
    - Add 03-not_define_reminder_actions.patch to do not define reminder
    actions (Closes: #770359)
    - Add 04_update_desktop_launcher.patch for add Unity Launcher
    Quicklist and Keywords in desktop file. (LP: #938015)
    - Refresh 02-disable_updates.patch.
    - Add 05-add-debian-hardening-flags.patch to using Debian hardening
      flags.
    - Add 06-tryfixplaylist.patch to fix playlist that disappear after
      leaving full-screen with openbox. (Closes: #799385, #799984)
  * debian/rules:
    - Remove /usr/share/doc/smplayer/es/gpl.htm
  * Update debian/copyright.
  * Add support for mpv: (Closes: #783401)
    - debian/control: Add mpv instead of mplayer|mplayer2.
  * Update debian/repack.local for new upstream version.

  [ Alf Gaida ]
  * debian/rules:
    - Make local rebuilds possible. (Closes: #770382)

Regards,
Mateusz Łukasik


Reply to: