[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#799615: marked as done (RFS: netmask/2.4.2-1 [ITA] - helps determine network masks)

Your message dated Fri, 2 Oct 2015 19:12:18 +0200
with message-id <560EBAF2.7070707@yahoo.it>
and subject line Re: Bug#799615: RFS: netmask/2.4.2-1 [ITA] - helps determine network masks
has caused the Debian Bug report #799615,
regarding RFS: netmask/2.4.2-1 [ITA] - helps determine network masks
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
799615: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799615
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "netmask"

* Package name    : netmask
  Version         : 2.4.0
  Upstream Author : Robert Stone <talby@trap.mtview.ca.us>
* URL             : https://github.com/talby-/netmask
* License         : GPL-2+
  Section         : net

It builds those binary packages:

  netmask - helps determine network masks

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/netmask

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netmask/netmask_2.4.0.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  [ Robert Stone ]
  * New upstream release.  (Closes: #79512.)

  [ Guilhem Moulin ]
  * New maintainer.  (Closes: #784185.)
  * debian/compat: bump debhelper compatibility level from 4 to 9.
  * debian/control:
    + Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes necessary).
    + Add 'Vcs-Git' and 'Vcs-Browser' fields.
    + Add 'dh-autoreconf' and 'texinfo' to Build-Depends.
  * debian/copyright: convert to machine-readable format (1.0).
  * debian/gbp.conf: add file.
  * netmask.texi: Add the missing '@direntry' to the info document.

Cheers,
-- 
Guilhem.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Control: owner -1 !

Built&Signed&Uploaded, thanks for the *nice* contribution to Debian!

your refactor is really nice and has been really appreciated!

keep up the good work!

Gianfranco

On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:36:26 +0200 Guilhem Moulin
<guilhem@guilhem.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 at 11:21:29 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
>> For the uscan OpenPGP support to work, upstream needs to release
>>  tarballs (using make distcheck), upload detached OpenPGP 
>> signatures and debian/watch needs to contain an pgpsigurlmangle= 
>> option. The github releases feature can be used to store the 
>> tarballs and detached OpenPGP signatures.
> 
> Yes I know, I do that on dropbear already :-)  Also in my first 
> mail to upstream I asked them to consider publishing detached 
> signatures along with the tarballs (although I didn't know it was 
> possible to do it with GitHub).  In the meantime I added 
> d/upstream/signing-key.asc so the world can check signatures on 
> upstream's Git tags against the same key that I use.  Signed Git 
> tags is so much better than no signature at all ;-)
> 
> -- Guilhem.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Nw/I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: