Hi Vincent, Gerrit, On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 at 18:42:53 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: > NMUs are intended to be minimally intrusive and be targeted to fix > specific bugs (and usually RC/important ones); that means that in > general, you should avoid things like new upstream releases and > extensive packaging changes, and your proposed debdiff should be as > small as possible. Yes I know: I intended to split the initramfs stuff, but I couldn't make multiple binary packages into the same source package without major refactoring. > Your changes are more in scope of a package adoption than a NMU. I'd be open for adoption of dropbear-initramfs indeed, but it's best to keep the same source package for the three dropbear-*, hence my offer to co-maintenance instead ;-) > While I don't want to discourage you from doing extensive work to > improve dropbear, you'll likely find it difficult to find a DD other > than the maintainer who's willing to sponsor this as a NMU. Fair enough, I'll wait then. Thanks for you answer anyway :-) -- Guilhem.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature