Bug#790771: marked as done (RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library)
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:24:41 +0000
with message-id <E1ZAKoT-0001kX-Mw@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library
has caused the Debian Bug report #790771,
regarding RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
790771: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790771
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas"
* Package name : clblas
Version : 2.4-2
Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS
* License : Apache version 2
Section : science
It builds those binary packages:
libclblas-bin - OpenCL BLAS library (executables)
libclblas-dev - OpenCL BLAS library (development files)
libclblas-doc - OpenCL BLAS library (documentation)
libclblas2 - OpenCL BLAS library (shared library)
libclblas2-dbg - OpenCL BLAS library (debugging symbols)
This package can be checked out at:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/h5py.git
This package can be built with:
gbp buildpackage --git-debian-branch=debian/sid \
--git-upstream-tag=v2.4 \
--git-no-pristine-tar
Changes since the last upload:
* Make package build reproducible. (Closes: #790122)
- Thanks to Maria Valentina Marin who provided the fix.
Best regards,
Ghislain
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package clblas version 2.4-1 is in unstable now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/clblas
--- End Message ---
Reply to: