[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#775284: marked as done (RFS: linuxptp/1.5-3 [ITP])

Your message dated Mon, 08 Jun 2015 09:56:07 +0200
with message-id <55754A97.8090909@debian.org>
and subject line RFS for linuxptp
has caused the Debian Bug report #775284,
regarding RFS: linuxptp/1.5-3 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
775284: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775284
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "linuxptp"

 Package name    : linuxptp
 Version         : 1.5-1
 Upstream Author : Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
 URL             : http://linuxptp.sourceforge.net/
 License         : GPL-2+
 Section         : utils

It builds those binary packages:

 linuxptp   - Precision Time Protocol (PTP, IEEE1588) implementation for Linux

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/linuxptp


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/linuxptp/linuxptp_1.5-1.dsc

More information about LinuxPTP can be obtained from
http://linuxptp.sourceforge.net/

Regards,
Tino Mettler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
linuxptp has found a sponsor (me).
the package is currently in the NEW queue, awaiting approval from
ftp-masters.

gfmdsar
IOhannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: