On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 04:36:58PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2015, at 01:27, Bill Blough wrote: > > * Added lintian overrides for issues that won't be fixed right now: > > no-upstream-changelog, no-symbols-control-file, shlib-calls-exit > > * Added lintian override for false positive (hardening) > > Please don't add lintian overrides for real problems just because > they're not going to be fixed soon. Removed the overrides and reuploaded to mentors. > > In this case, adding the hardening lintian override would be correct > (assuming it really is a false-positive -- make really really sure it is > a false positive before you add such an override), but the other ones > are best not overriden. blhc passes and a visual inspection of the build log shows that the flags are being included on the command line. Which leads me to wonder - am I missing an edge case where it could *not* be a false positive? Thanks for your feedback! Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature