[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#779377: RFS: classified-ads/0.03-1 / ITP



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tobias Frost writes:
 > Control: owner -1 !
 > Control: tags -1 pending

Aye, best aprils fool's prank for some time :)

 > Debian sees the (high-res image) as part of the source code, the
 > preferred form of the source actually. So you should include it into
 > your tarball and create the actual bitmaps at build-time.

Hmm, I could do something like introducing a build-time dependency to 
imagemagick (I think I crafted the lower-resolution bitmaps with gimp by
hand) and try to do the format+size conversion tricks with that? 

Isn't imagemagick a bit huge and unconventional build-dependency? 

 > Sure, just follow the ITa procedure. (I will also sponsor you on this)
...
 > Its just a git repository ;-) No big risk to ruin everything.
 > You could also move the repository somewhere else, if you don't like
 > collab-maint. 

Yes, this was actually my question ; is it ok for me to fork the 
collab-maint repo of qemuctl to some other place (say, github) and
make the changelog-change from there and reference that in ITA-ticket?

Or is getting write permission to repository in collab-maint a
difficult process? Anything goes, my primary interface is anyway git
and the address of remote repository is not much an issue..

 > For the upload procedure:
 > In short-term, yes: You need a sponsor for upload.
 > Mid-Terms: You can become a Debian Maintainer with upload rights 
 > for your packages (https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer)
 > Long-Term: You join the project as Debian Developer 

Ok, I've read through https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer
and https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer/Tutorial and feel ok with
privileges and responsibilities regarding becoming a maintainer. This
anyway looks like the way of least hassle for keeping my packages
up-to-date. 

I'll write about this to debian-devel-announce. 

But here I need advice as https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer
says I'll need a PGP-key with at least 2k key length. 
 
The key I used at https://mentors.debian.net/my was my pgp key that I
normally use. I don't consider it compromised, it is from year 2000
and has 1k key len -> do I fullfill the requirement if I add
additional longer encryption key into my current key and replace the
key in mentors ; the key in there still has no signatures from any
party relevant in this debian process..

And it there any (documented? where? )process for .. situation that a
maintainer might face, like 
 1. notification a new bug report
 2. creation of patch
 3. ???
 4. upload to ftp.upload.debian.org
especially the step three there is interesting..

In long term I can consider trying to become DD too. But lets start
with small amount of packages..

 > I saw that debian/source/format is missing in the repository.

Ahem. Not any more. 

- --
Antti

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAlUcTCEACgkQUTdja+nNMWNAgQCdGEHMEYi46hA7ugWAUQYxYMKZ
cG8AnR8YeSh6jXiwCig7rlH2NSvZH/q4
=MObn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: