[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#781381: marked as done (RFS: h5py/2.2.1-2~exp1 -- general-purpose Python interface to hdf5)



Your message dated Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:47:53 +0100
with message-id <CAFzxpWoRudFXAsaNxdrR76JJMsQ0VJW_bLjQFSGzLvpCwSA70w@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #781381,
regarding RFS: h5py/2.2.1-2~exp1 -- general-purpose Python interface to hdf5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
781381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal


Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the source package "h5py".

It builds the following binary packages:
 python-h5py  -- Python 2 version
python3-h5py -- Python 3 version


This upload serves a transition towards team-maintenance of
h5py under the Debian-science umbrella. I also took this
opportunity to modernize the packaging using pybuild and clean
some of the long-standing lintian warnings.

This package can be checked out at:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/h5py.git

This package can be built with:
 gbp buildpackage --git-debian-branch=debian/experimental \
--git-upstream-branch=upstream/2.2.x


Changes since the last upload:

* Move package maintenance over to d-science.
* Bump standards version to 3.6 (no changes required).
* Use pybuild as package build system.
* d/watch: use pypi.debian.net

Best regards,
Ghislain

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: h5py
Version: 2.2.1-2~exp1

--- End Message ---

Reply to: