Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

[Pierre Rudloff <contact@rudloff.pro>]

Hello,

Sorry for not answering before, I had quite a lot of work.
I have upadated the package as you asked: 
http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris

Regards,


Le 19/09/2014 12:42, Eriberto a écrit :
> Hi Pierre,
>
> You is very very near an upload.
>
> Note that file data/ui/about-dialog.ui is GPL-3+ (not GPL-3). So, you
> need to create a section for this file in d/copyright.
>
> Considering that you need to modify the copyright file, I will make a
> new request for you. Please, add a reference about you, Debian and
> free usage of the manpage. This is important because manpages are
> published in several sites (without the source code) and someone might
> want to contact you. You can see an example here[1]. (go to the end of
> page)
>
> [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/mac-robber/1.02-3/debian/man/mac-robber.1
>
> Please, make these changes and I will upload the package. I will wait for you...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eriberto
>
> 2014-09-19 4:31 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff <contact@rudloff.pro>:
> > It is on mentors : https://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > 2014-09-19 1:40 GMT+02:00 Eriberto Mota <eriberto@debian.org>:
> > > Please, upload your package to mentors.d.n. It makes easier the review
> > > and, maybe final, tests. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Eriberto
> > >
> > > Em quinta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2014, Pierre Rudloff
> > > <contact@rudloff.pro> escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Oh OK, I did not see there was some files by different auhtors in the
> > > > tarball.
> > > >
> > > > I added them to the copyright file:
> > > > https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian/commit/aa24f3a5b4f865cf9eb00f6746ce199eca0f0147
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again for your help!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Le 18/09/2014 01:42, Eriberto a écrit :
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2014-09-17 17:41 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff <contact@rudloff.pro>:
> > > > > > > > 3.
> > > > > > > >            - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format.
> > > > > > > >            - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a
> > > > > > > > field
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > this in the 1.0 format.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can consult any copyright in Debian packages to see an example.
> > > > > > > You can use these:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/netmate/unstable_copyright
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_copyright
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I edited the copyright file. Is it OK now?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The format is right now. However, you must to list all upstream
> > > > > authors and licenses in d/copyright. See the second example above
> > > > > (ext4magic). You can use this command to help you: 'grep -sriA25
> > > > > copyright *'.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from
> > > > > > > upstream code.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've added a sentence explaining this. Is this enough? (There is no
> > > > > > special
> > > > > > step needed, as dpkg-source -x takes care of replacing the debian
> > > > > > folder.)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes. Perfect.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > Eriberto