Re: Bug#749152: RFS: top/2.2.3-1 [ITP]

[Kumar Appaiah <a.kumar@alumni.iitm.ac.in>]

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 04:54:40PM +0200, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
>  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "top"
> 
>     Package name    : top
>     Version         : 2.2.3-1
>     Upstream Author : Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira@free.fr>
>     URL             : http://hugo.pereira.free.fr/software/
>     License         : GPL2
>     Programming lang: C++ / Qt5
>     Section         : admin
> 
>  It builds this binary package:
> 
>     top   - windowed version of the console top command

Thanks for your work on this.

I am wondering whether "top" is the best package name, and "Top" the
best binary name. I, for one, would be a little confused, given that
the standard tool in the procps package is also named "top". What is
your opinion? Would a different package name be an option?

Thanks.

Kumar

-- 
No, that's wrong too.  Now there's a race condition between the rm and
the mv.  Hmm, I need more coffee.
		-- Guy Maor on Debian Bug#25228