Hi mentors, I'm in the process of preparing new packaging for GNS3. Currently source package gns3 produces one binary package also named gns3. The newer version of the software has been split into a separate gui/server (separate source packages). For the new packaging I prose the following: Source : Binaries gns3-server : gns3-server gns3-gui : gns3-gui, gns3 (metapackage depending on gui/server) This creates a clash between the two gns3 binary packages. Therefore what I propose is to modify the packaging of the old version to create a gns3-legacy binary package, to give users the option of using the older version should they wish to do so. But at the same time providing an upgrade path from gns3 0.8.x to 1.x (using the new gns3 metapackage). Does this seem sane? Regards Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature