[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#765883: marked as done (RFS: avce00/2.0.0-5)



Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:24:54 +0000
with message-id <E1Xhhfa-0001Wh-Sy@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: avce00/2.0.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #765883,
regarding RFS: avce00/2.0.0-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
765883: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765883
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "avce00"

 * Package name    : avce00
   Version         : 2.0.0-5
   Upstream Author : Daniel Morissette
 * URL             : http://avce00.maptools.org/
 * License         : MIT
   Section         : science

  It builds those binary packages:

    avce00     - Conversion of ESRI Arcinfo Vector Coverage in E00 format

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/avce00


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/avce00/avce00_2.0.0-5.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Move to debhelper 9

  * Enable hardening when compiling/linking
  * Bump standards version, fix vcs links (cme fix dpkg-control)
  * Remove duplicate changelog
  * Add doc-base
  * Add myself to uploaders



  Regards,
   Johan Van de Wauw

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package avce00 has been removed from mentors.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: