On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:57:48AM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote: > > this is application package, so ruby- prefix removed package name > > "serverspec-runner" is suitable. > According to guideline, It seems that it's ok to have "ruby-" prefix. > (optional choice) > (I want it for unification with "ruby-serverspec", though it should have > been named as "serverspec"...) "serverspec" is mainly used as a library (framework), not as an application, so "ruby-serverspec" is suitable package name for it. naming unification is not much important, i think. -- Regards, dai GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature