[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]



Hi Pierre,

2014-09-16 16:13 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff <contact@rudloff.pro>:

> 2.
>         - Done.


Please, read again my instructions in item 2 in last mail. You didn't
changed the Depends field.


>         - My work is now on GitHub: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian
> GitHub uses the same URL for browser and git clone, you should I still fill
> both fields?


Yes, this is right.


>         - You can manually add to your Lutris library any game that can be
> installed on your computer (either natively or with Wine). Do you think the
> description can be misleading?
>         - Are you talking about game platforms? I've added a list of those.


Yes, sorry for my mistake.


> 3.
>         - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format.
>         - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a field for
> this in the 1.0 format.


You can consult any copyright in Debian packages to see an example.
You can use these:

http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/netmate/unstable_copyright

http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_copyright



> 5. Lintian was complaining that the package did not include any upstream
> changelog so I added one from the upstream debian directory (oddly, I only
> contained information about the software itself and not the packaging).
> Anyway, I removed it.


Ok. It isn't a problem. This lintian message can be ignored because
you depends of the upstream. However, you can suggest him to add a
license.


> 6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK?


No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from
upstream code.

Cheers,

Eriberto


Reply to: