Bug#752897: rm -rf debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/lucene++-3.0.6/
Hi Tobias
> Il Domenica 31 Agosto 2014 14:15, Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org> ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 08:23 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> Hi Tobias, sorry for top posting, I'm on vac and mobile :-)
>>
>> The reason for the VCS not created is that I'm not yet in the ubuntu
>> unity team, so I don't have write permissions to create it :-)
>>
>> I'll talk to sil how does he feel about maintaining in
>> collab-maint/git!
>>
>> As you can see I'm a proud git and git-buildpackage user, so I'll
>> benefit a lot from the git usage :-)
>>
>> In the meanwhile feel free to drop them, the new upstream release I
>> think will come shortly (basically I got accepted all my patches and I
>> think we have testsuite working on git right now, I tested it a little
>> bit).
>>
>> So we can add CVS in the second upload, I'll also try to use the
>> system gconv rather than the (working) embedded one!
>>
>> Have many thanks for your time!
>>
>> Gianfranco
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> Yes, collab-maint would be indeed the best option and can be done after
> the initial upload. So just remove VCS-* for now and re-add once you've
> decided how to go on.
>
Removed
> Back to the package. Sorry, took me longer than expected to take deeper
> look, but the review should be complete now. So I think this will be the
> last iteration...
>
> During the review of d/copyright I found those mismatches which might
> need clarification:
>
> -> ./src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/ar/ArabicAnalyzer.cpp
> ./src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/fa/PersianAnalyzer.cpp
> seems to be generated from BSD Data. Not sure how they have been
> generated and what is the effective license is indeed tricky. Can you
> check with upstream how the data is processed and if that is enough to
> constitute a new copyright? (However, It would be best if the files
> could be autogenerated at build time and the stoplist file distributed
> with the tarball.)
> For now, I'd recommend to add an comment to d/copyright stating that the
> file has been created using BSD-Licensed data from http://...
https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/issues/70
>
> -> ./src/contrib/snowball/libstemmer_c/* is missing in d/copyright and
> it is (as far as can see) an embedded code copy. (Debian source package
> snowball). As convenience copies are strongly discouraged, please try to
> patch lucene so it will link against the package version.
> (If you find out, this is not feasible, please let me know along with
> your reasoning)
>
https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/issues/71
> So, this seems now to be the last two points to be fixed. Then I'll
> upload it :)
>
thanks again, I opened the two above upstream issues, because the problem
is not debian-specific and I'm not in the position of force a system library
when a custom delta might be needed (and moreover I don't see it used, as
I wrote on the issue).
So I'll update as soon as I get upstream feedbacks!
Cheers!
G.
>
> --
> tobi
>
Reply to: