[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#759296: RFS: psensor/1.0.4-1



> > 
> > I am not DD, I cannot sponsor you package but have a question,
> > why is priority for psensor extra ? Should it not be optional ?
> > 
> > [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html
> 
> According to the definition of 'optional':
> "This is all the software that you might reasonably want to install if
> you didn't know what it was"

On the other hand the definition for extra is:

The extra priority will usually work for new packages that conflict
with others with non-extra priorities.

Since your package is normal package and does not conflict with
anything else, IMHO it should be optional. 

extra is fine for debugging symbols, maybe big manuals and so on. Your
package is a GUI that can be optional. 

Policy also points to TeX as an example. You do not need it, it is
optional, you can install it and it will not conflict with anything
else. 

> 
> psensor is a GUI for monitoring hardware sensor, it displays graphs and
> raise alerts to users (AppIndicator, notify bubbles, tray icon). AFAIK,
> it is not required by any other packages.
> 
> I don't see any reason why it should be installed if the user does not
> want to access himself information about fan speeds, CPU temperatures,
> etc. I don't believe that most users take care of this kind of information.

Optional does not mean this. It just means "hey you can install it if
you want or need this package". It does not imply that you must
install it or it is pulled by something. 


That is just my opinion, it would be the best that some DD would
clarify this, thus I cc eriberto on this.






-- 
Dariusz Dwornikowski, 
  Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology
  www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/  
  room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: