[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#755718: RFS: nltk/3.0.0b1-1 [ITP] -- Python Natural Language Toolkit



Hi Daniel,

thanks for finalising nltk.  I just sponsored the package since I it was
fine in terms of packaging.

Hint for the SoB[1] mechanism: I really want you to care for the injection
of the package into the Blends framework.  Since you do not have commit
permissions I would have proxied the needed

diff --git a/tasks/linguistics b/tasks/linguistics
index 6526e84..bbcc7e8 100644
--- a/tasks/linguistics
+++ b/tasks/linguistics
@@ -52,3 +52,4 @@ Pkg-Description: SQL version of WordNet 3.0
 
 Depends: travatar
 
+Suggests: python-nltk, python3-nltk


for you and I did it right now which has lead to the fact that it is
just listed on the according sentinel page at

   http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/linguistics#python-nltk

I simply want to make people aware about the advantages of the Blends
framework.  Tomorrow (=after next cron job) this entry will propagate
to the section "Packages in new".

Since you seem to be comfortable with linguistics I wonder what
you think about a linguistics-dev task to develop linguistic
applications (where we could turn the "Suggests" into "Depends").
I thinks all lib*-dev packages in this list are good candidates.
What do you (and other readers) think?

Kind regards

        Andreas.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: