Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)
- From: Faré <fahree@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:56:08 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAN7nBXfbsjN33v1e3sZdNxUmnSRtoawJVuKA=A-1bP1FSQfPgw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <CAN7nBXc0OKDeFVwusSrieAed-UoVmXK5d2N-UaiMnQP6=wCzug@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTik69m2sNDhLCuMKawDpYo5hJqLQaWoBuaXTsuZC@mail.gmail.com> <CAN7nBXd3QO-BSUqMq7n9+ok2AF70UwM36Uc=wNyh6YMK9L4h2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAN7nBXfuwzY0P=7AD6udLFbo8VUzUZfYdr_aiLjDAEuLEer=hw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN7nBXdUKycQy8tjfWpUuEL8k80NzZ+UKx7a_oU6eQPd3F4GLw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN7nBXezMbt_wNR4iArdvm4pSVFV43+BS4bTx_4vOGkv297HFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN7nBXdh3PjxW+UVYrWziU-2H5h6sN_SHMAZuggxXqQ6fdKhzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN7nBXeuchhgkRZ2d7z_kaeymFFQX8sEafVC9THuFk9n3Vwf6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAN7nBXeK-7PxkR17EDNVYiGpChKPaF4QogOSeCxDcs2ZNA-6xQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN7nBXc0OKDeFVwusSrieAed-UoVmXK5d2N-UaiMnQP6=wCzug@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.7-1
of my package "cl-launch".
It builds these binary packages:
cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell
The package appears to be lintian clean (except that I'm using
an old Standards-Version on this Ubuntu 12.04LTS).
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch/cl-launch_4.0.7-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
We know how syntax is prefix in LISP, whereas FORTH has a postfix syntax and
C's syntax is braindeadfix; well, the syntax of XML is a syntax that is a
hardcorepornfix syntax: it does it in the all places at the same time.
Reply to: