[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#752339: Some questions about RFS: dbuskit/0.1.1-1 [ITP]



On 15-07-14 16:05, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>> Well, the source has to be DFSG-free. How we guarantee that usually is
>> by building everything from source during the build. If you don't want
>> to build it, you have to remove them from source and repack
> 
> I don't understand.  It is quite common for a package not to build
> some part of the source; this is not a problem at all as long as
> everything is DFSG-compliant.  Which is the case here.

This is true if you mean that not all source is used during a build.
However, a lot of the Debian developers (yes, there is debate on this
how far you should stretch this argument) consider a tar-ball to meet
the DFSG if the files are either the preferred form for modification OR
build-able from such a form with tools available in Debian (e.g. MS
Windows executables in the source are frowned upon by most). In order to
guarantee that they are indeed buildable, a lot of DD's will just say,
let's build them than.

Whatever you do, to prevent accidental usage of a pre-build object file
it is very common to at least clean them.

Paul


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: