[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#751208: RFS: lusernet.app/0.4.2-7



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lusernet.app".
It builds these binary packages:

  lusernet.app - News reader for GNUstep

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/lusernet.app

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lusernet.app/lusernet.app_0.4.2-7.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * Ack NMU, thanks Colin Watson.
  * debian/source/format: Switch to 3.0 (quilt).
  * debian/control (Build-Depends): Remove dpatch.
    (Vcs-Arch): Replace with Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser.
    (Homepage): Remove; not accessible.
    (Standards-Version): Compliant with 3.9.5 as of this release.
  * debian/rules: Don't include dpatch.mk.  Enable hardening.
    (clean): Merge the clean-patched recipe here.
    (build-arch, build-indep): New targets as required by Policy.
  * debian/patches/00list:
  * debian/patches/05_pantomime1.2.dpatch:
  * debian/patches/07_missing-includes.dpatch:
  * debian/patches/10_mark_string_as_translatable.dpatch:
  * debian/patches/20_bg_translation.dpatch:
  * debian/patches/30_link_order.dpatch:
  * debian/patches/40_modern_objc_api.dpatch: Rename/quiltify as...
  * debian/patches/series:
  * debian/patches/pantomime1.2.patch:
  * debian/patches/missing-includes.patch:
  * debian/patches/mark-string-as-translatable.patch:
  * debian/patches/bg-translation.patch:
  * debian/patches/link-order.patch:
  * debian/patches/modern-objc-api.patch: ...and add DEP-3 headers.
  * debian/patches/gcc-warnings.patch: New (Closes: #749758).
  * debian/README.source: Delete.
  * debian/watch: Update for the new upstream location, even though
    there's no release yet.
  * debian/LuserNET.desktop: Add Keywords field.
  * debian/copyright: Switch to format 1.0.


Reply to: