[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [help] volview: FTBFS: vtkKWWizard.cxx:162:51: error: 'Tcl_Interp' has no member named 'result'



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 04/15/2014 04:07 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> is there any kind C++ capable soul who could provide a patch for this
> problem?

A bit of Googling seems to indicate that this is due to building against
Tcl 8.6:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902561

As a short-term thing, you can probably get it working by either adding
- -DUSE_INTERP_RESULT to the CPPFLAGS at build time, or patching some
appropriate internal header to include the same define - or possibly by
explicitly build-depending on tcl8.5-dev, though I don't know enough
about Tcl or its packaging to speak to that approach.

In the long term, as the link indicates, the correct fix would involve
modifying the source to avoid using internal fields from Tcl_Interp.
However, that seems like the sort of thing that would be best done by
upstream.

- --
   The Wanderer

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.

A government exists to serve its citizens, not to control them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=xeha
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: