[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#741449: gsnmp/0.3.0-2



Control: tag -1 + moreinfo

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@cubewerk.de> wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
>   Severity: normal
>
>   Dear mentors,
>
>   I am looking for a sponsor for my co-maintainer package "gsnmp"
>
>  * Package name    : gsnmp
>    Version         : 0.3.0-2
>    Upstream Author : Schoenwaelder, Juergen (j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de)
>  * URL             : https://cnds.eecs.jacobs-university.de/svn/schoenw/src/gsnmp/
>  * License         : GPL
>    Section         : net
>
>   It builds those binary packages:
>
>     libgsnmp0  - SNMP library implementation based on glib and gnet
>  libgsnmp0-dbg - SNMP library implementation based on glib and gnet (debug files)
>  libgsnmp0-dev - SNMP library implementation based on glib and gnet (development f
>
>   To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
>
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/gsnmp
>
>
>   Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
>     dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gsnmp/gsnmp_0.3.0-2.dsc
>
>   More information about hello can be obtained from https://cnds.eecs.jacobs-university.de/svn/schoenw/src/gsnmp/
>
>   Changes since the last upload:
>
>   * Bump Standards to 3.9.5
>   * Fix typos in description fields of debian/control
>   * Set debhelper to 9
>   * use dh-autoreconf instead of autotools-dev to fix FTBFS
>     on ppc64el - Thanks to Logan Rosen <logan@ubuntu.com>
>     (Closes: #735392)
>   * Build depend on dh-autoreconf instead of autotools-dev as consequence
>   * set source format to 3.0 (quilt)
>   * Adjust debian/control Uploader-Field
>   * Add Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends} for multiarch-support

You need to declare Multi-Arch: same in the debian/control stanzas for
the package that you are multiarch-ifying. I suggest converting your
-dev and -dbg packages to multiarch as well, while you're at it.

Regards,
Vincent


Reply to: