[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#740105:



ok, i'll try and fix the issues when i get home.


On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Maximiliano Curia <maxy@gnuservers.com.ar> wrote:
In article <CA+K2i_0wve7+ZD1DFw23i1SJ_5XyjayqbNgCVR3Mh2pmjN5PNg__13447.6975458258$1393361480$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> The package is also at lp:~noskcaj/xsane/packaging if you wish to review it
> there

What's the address of the upstream current git repository? The website lists a
commit list in alioth, but I couldn't find the upstream code.

About the package, the copyright file is a bit too simplified, there is a file
under the Artistic License, another in LGPL, and some files list the FSF as
copyright holder, I've used licensecheck from the devscript package to check
this.

There are some formatting issues (the build-depends line is 189 chars wide, for
instance), lately I've been using wrap-and-sort to deal with this nuisances.

The corrupt-filename.patch produces an if else else, as the problem was fixed
upstream as well. Could you please check the other patches it they are still
needed (or are actually breaking stuff like this one).

Happy hacking,
--
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and BSD.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
-- Jeremy S. Anderson
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/


Reply to: