[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706361: marked as done (RFS: gti/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Humorous typo-based git runner)

Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2013 09:11:11 +1000
with message-id <201305250911.12337.onlyjob@member.fsf.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706361: gti review
has caused the Debian Bug report #706361,
regarding RFS: gti/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Humorous typo-based git runner
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
706361: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706361
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gti":

  Package Name    : gti
  Version         : 1.0.4+git.20130416.8b0819d-1
  Upstream Author : Richard Wossal
  URL             : http://r-wos.org/hacks/gti
  License         : Old-Style MIT
  Section         : games

It builds the binary package:

  gti - Humorous typo-based git runner; drives a car over the terminal

To access further information about this package, please visit:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/gti

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gti/gti_1.0.4+git.20130416.8b0819d-1.dsc

More information about gti can be obtained from the upstream author's homepage:

  http://r-wos.org/hacks/gti

Packaging work is tracked in the following repository:

  https://gitorious.org/deb-packaging/gti-deb-packaging

It is also mirrored to:

  https://github.com/felixc/gti-deb-packaging

Regards,

Felix Crux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hello Felix,

On Sat, 25 May 2013 06:38:01 Felix Crux wrote:
> Thanks again for another round of review! I think I've addressed all the
> comments now, and have uploaded a new version. Note that the version number
> changed again, since upstream merged the patch that I forwarded. The package
> is now available from
> 
>   http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gti/gti_1.1.1-1.dsc
> 

Well done Felix, I just uploaded it with one minor correction to short
package description which shouldn't start with capital letter:

    -Description: Humorous typo-based git runner; drives a car over the terminal
    +Description: humorous typo-based git runner; drives a car over the terminal

Please update your repository to reflect this change.

> > Please do not use spaces in short license name -- see examples in
> > copyright-format-1.0 specification which clearly state that "License
> > names are case-insensitive, and may not contain spaces". Remember I
> > suggested to use "MIT-old-style" not "MIT Old Style"? ;)
> 
> Oh interesting, I didn't realize that distinction at first. I've updated
> the name to use hyphens instead of spaces.
> 
> By the way, is this the sort of thing lintian should be checking for? I might
> go look into how to add a new rule, if people think that makes sense.

Your work will be highly appreciated if you contribute such check to
lintian . :)

But please keep in mind that there are a legitimate cases of dual
licensing that like "GPL-2+ or Expat" that new lintian check should
recognise.

> I've removed the explanantions on the description. I've also changed "no" to
> "not-needed" in the "Forwarded" fields. Is there a meaningful difference
> between those two forms? The documentation seems to indicate they are
> equivalent, but "not-needed" seems clearer.

"Forwarded: no" means simply that the patch is not forwarded (yet).
This is to mark pending patches that potentially useful upstream.


> > I checked updated version and to my taste the car is still moving too
> > fast. Of course this is not a problem, just feedback.
> 
> Agreed. This version now includes a new patch that slows the car down. It's
> now almost exactly the same speed as 'sl'.

Thank you.


> Thanks again for looking over everything! Sounds like we're getting near a
> a finished, correct, package! Cheers,

Congratulations. :)
Hopefully your new package will be approved by ftp-masters soon.

You can find "gti" in NEW queue:

    https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

Please keep in mind that any package is best to be team-maintained.
I'd like to suggest you to get account on Alioth [1] so you could join
miscellaneous packaging teams [2] that are close to your heart. I
imagine you might be interested to participate in "pkg-games" [3] and
hopefully some other teams.

[1]: https://alioth.debian.org/
[2]: http://wiki.debian.org/Teams
[3]: http://wiki.debian.org/Games/Team

Best wishes,
 Dmitry Smirnov
 GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B

---

Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under.
        -- H. L. Mencken

--- End Message ---
Reply to: