[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package



On 2013-12-22 12:03, Vincent Bernat wrote:
  ❦ 22 décembre 2013 12:10 CET, Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com> :

"ITP stands for Intend to package. These are packages which not exist in
Debian yet. Such packages need to go through NEW. That is the queue on
ftp-master for packages uploaded for the first time, which need to be
reviewed first. This includes renames, packages moving between areas,
and source-packages that build new binary packages."

So, ITP seemed the right tag for a rename. Let me know if I need to do
something else.

To recap: I've been maintaining this package as a DM for several years;
just I need someone to approve the rename as I don't have permission to
do it myself.

https://mentors.debian.net/package/0install

Could someone explain what I need to do to get the new debs approved?

You are renaming the source package. Is it really necessary? This is
possible, but it is a bit painful to manage. With a new source package,
you need to issue a -1 version. This means to add an epoch to let your
transitional package take over the previous binary package.

Keeping the same source package name and just changing the binary
package names would be far easier.

OK, I've changed the source name back to how it was and uploaded the new version here:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/zeroinstall-injector

Can it be approved now?

Thanks,


--
Dr Thomas Leonard        http://0install.net/
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6  8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA  BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA


Reply to: