Re: About the testing transition known as auto-libunwind

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: About the testing transition known as auto-libunwind
From: T o n g <mlist4suntong@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:19:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] l96vuh$mqh$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] l95jnp$9ti$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 52B6AEF2.6030207@thykier.net>

On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:20:50 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:

>In the particular case, not much. libunwind is somewhat a special case...

Thanks a lot for your detailed explanation Niels!

Reply to:

References:
- About the testing transition known as auto-libunwind
  - From: T o n g <mlist4suntong@yahoo.com>
- Re: About the testing transition known as auto-libunwind
  - From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package
Next by Date: Bug#718206: marked as done (RFS: ruby-rkerberos/0.1.2-2 [ITP])
Previous by thread: Re: About the testing transition known as auto-libunwind
Next by thread: Bug#718206: marked as done (RFS: ruby-rkerberos/0.1.2-2 [ITP])
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread