Bug#729354: [SoB] Re: RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:58:41PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> > It is not (yet) in DEP5 but the patch made it in devscripts Git. What
> > drawbacks do you mean?
>
> For example, this:
> -->8--
> One drawback of the Files-Excluded method was mentioned: There is no
> reasonable way to give file by file (rather pattern by pattern)
> comment why the file(s) were removed.
> -->8--
> It seems, that Files-Excluded field can be only in the header section
> and that's the reason.
Well, considering that you had
./07/tek2ps/ have been removed from sources
where exactly is the problem that you can not give pattern by pattern
comments?
> > No, it was not (at the time when I wrote my mail) in both places.
>
> Then I'm little lost in what's pending from my side. It seems,
> git repo was in sync with my local repo (except from your commit 1e336a9).
>
> uscan changes?
I was wrong in my previous mail.
commit 0ad53cbac9e7e46fe1dee4df774bdcab9ba2faaa
Author: Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpichev@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Dec 1 18:45:41 2013 +0400
fix license fields
was inside the repository and it is uploaded.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: