Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package
- From: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 15:46:52 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] l6qil2$med$1@ger.gmane.org>
- In-reply-to: <CAP+dXJd-27oiV95Q9fp2BDxk0DGh-T-31MBX_eBqHcEWXaUJ-w__13685.4315562688$1384640861$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAP+dXJd-27oiV95Q9fp2BDxk0DGh-T-31MBX_eBqHcEWXaUJ-w__13685.4315562688$1384640861$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
[ sorry for the late reply; I didn't get an email notification for some
reason ]
On 2013-11-16 22:26, Eriberto wrote:
A doubt: where is the ITP bug???
Thanks!
Regards,
I'm not sure what you mean. Do I need to file a bug somewhere as well?
According to http://mentors.debian.net/sponsor/rfs-howto:
"ITP stands for Intend to package. These are packages which not exist in
Debian yet. Such packages need to go through NEW. That is the queue on
ftp-master for packages uploaded for the first time, which need to be
reviewed first. This includes renames, packages moving between areas,
and source-packages that build new binary packages."
So, ITP seemed the right tag for a rename. Let me know if I need to do
something else.
To recap: I've been maintaining this package as a DM for several years;
just I need someone to approve the rename as I don't have permission to
do it myself.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/0install
Thanks,
Reply to: