On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 08:50:42AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 12 novembre 2013 15:12 CET, Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> : > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "spiped". This is > > the first version uploaded to the Debian archive; the corresponding > > ITP bug is #699310. > > > > * Package name : spiped > > Version : 1.3.1 > > Upstream Author : Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com> > > * URL : http://www.tarsnap.com/spiped.html > > * License : BSD-2 > > Section : utils > > Programming Lang: C > > Description : create secure pipes between socket addresses > > I did notice that half of your debian/rules is just setting "custom" > CFLAGS/LDFLAGS. Is that useful? You can simplify a bit by using > DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND and the likes. You're right, it did make the rules file a bit shorter - although not dramatically so, since all the warning flag lines are still there :) This was a leftover from olden times when debhelper would not automatically use dpkg-buildflags; I guess I didn't remove them until now for the sake of possible backports, but that's not an issue any longer now that we have debhelper 9.x even in squeeze-backports. Thanks, I made this change and uploaded the updated package to the same mentors.d.n location: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spiped/spiped_1.3.1-1.dsc G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org p.penchev@storpool.com PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 This sentence contradicts itself - or rather - well, no, actually it doesn't!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature