Bug#714310: RFS: polyphone/1.1-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS: polyphone/1.0-1 [ITP]

[Daniel Lintott <daniel@serverb.co.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Davy,

N.B: I'm not a DD, so cannot sponsor your package myself. I'm also
fairly new to reviewing, so forgive me if I miss something!

The Review:

1. As your package is not yet in debian, the entries in debian/changelog
should be merged to a single entry, for the version of the package that
will enter Debian.

This will also ensure your ITP bug is closed correctly upon upload.

2. a. debian/compat - The current level is 9
   b. debian/control - Build depend on dephelper can be changed to
debhelper (>= 9)

3. debian/rules - The dh_make comment can be removed from this file

4. The package builds successfully in my unstable chroot.
   Lintian reports the following:
	
N: Processing binary package polyphone (version 1.1-1, arch amd64) ...
I: polyphone: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/polyphone ment meant
I: polyphone: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/polyphone INFORMATIONS
INFORMATION
I: polyphone: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/polyphone dONt don't

Regards
 Daniel Lintott
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSfloQAAoJEMw/9yOWzAkJlgYIAKI7L6ra1NtSZH57B5Bd65Qr
boXxT3Gt2X8nQT7e5hAVC7nl6dNiqFd63ob/KVHFUyBDIrGme1JzXtaS6DQns4hg
T4LotybsGCn7sWVpdT94QbJwqtJBecK3RpB9pr87bJQDfOd+d71WtZrkj0mabt/T
COvDUE/SwIVJdaxqIz48BFrzFDkWGbhKswKmJ78sz5b8b/Z2FlV5RWnQ6WMrvg2B
9QZDoSHaP2lCWFXGgIZlRG9h+er482LkL6/nz26erlrhArov7CqCjyfAVrfRH5dd
ojpA3MJOW2TZN9d0foJn8O49Ssc3eKHUVl4N4xpeY/T+UzhvFgq/g2bqx7lY218=
=rkOe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----