[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#726835: RFS: qgit/2.5-2 [RC]



Hi,

>>  How about bug report #641745? It looks easy fixable.
>
> I still don't think it's a problem of qgit (or any other package providing
> this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview).

Still? I don't see your opinion in bug report. Please send your comment there.
And do not forget to Cc the submitter: he will be able to write other arguments
or he will agree with you.

>>  Lintian show one tag, which is easy fixable as well:
>>  I: qgit: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry usr/share/applications/qgit.desktop
>
> I don't think the maintainer should, or even can, add Keywords to upstream
> .desktop files (as opposed to Categories).

Upstream does not provide the the .desktop file. You provide it in debian
subdirectory:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/qgit.git;a=blob;f=debian/qgit.desktop;hb=HEAD

> See also "Whether the desktop
> file needs to have a Keywords line added is somewhat subjective." (from
> https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/DesktopFileKeywords ).

While it is not obligated, it is really easy to add one line in .desktop file
to make few GNOME users more happy. Something like [1] should be enough I
think.

[1] Keywords=RevisionControlSystem;VCS;DCVS;git;

Even in my system with KDE I see now:
$ grep -R ^Keywords= /usr/share/applications/* | wc -l
28

>>  Also there are few bug reports on Launchpad:
>>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qgit
>>  They might be interesting for you.
>
> They are either wishlist or unreproducible on current version, so no.

Ok. So they might be commented and/or closed, right? Though it is a
maintainer's decision to ignore or not ignore users of derivative distros.

Best regards,
Boris


Reply to: