Re: Bug#724807: RFS: yt/2013.09.28-1 [ITP]
+++ Dominik George [2013-09-28 23:19 +0200]:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I have worked closely together with Javier on fixing issues with his
> youtube-cli (formerly yt) package. It appears to be of good quality now,
> and I found Javier to be a good teamplayer and accepting and reacting to
> criticism really well, so I'd consider him fit for maintainership of the
> package.
>
> I'd really love to see youtube-cli in Debian.
Can the description say something about how this differs from
youtube-dl (which I now use habitually), clive (which I used to use
until it stopped working for youtube), and get-flash-video, which I
also use sometimes. And it seems there is quvi too now.
We seem to have a lot of these, and there may be good reasons for
that, but descriptions that help users choose accurately are very
helpful.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/
Reply to: