[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#714734: bug 714734 has subject RFS: marisa/0.2.4-1 [ITP] - Tools and libs for a static and space-efficient trie data structure



On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 21:55 +0900, Mitsuya Shibata wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> 2013/7/3 Mònica Ramírez <monica@debian.org>:
> >> > Sponsorship requests should not be assigned to wnpp package.
> >> > I'm undoing last actions sent to control server.
> >>
> >>  How do we handle this sponsorship-requests pseudo package?
> >>  Please let me know.
> >
> > "After you uploaded a package, please close the bug report by sending a
> > mail to nnn-done@bugs.debian.org. Do not close RFS bugs in
> > debian/changelog. It is the sponsor who solves the issue, not the
> > supplier of the package or anyhow related to the package itself."
> 
> Thank you for your advice!
> But I got a little confused ...
> 
> What I would like to do:
> - Send ITP
> - Get reviewere and sponsor for my package via mentors.debian.net
> 
> I referred following sites:
> - http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#How_do_I_add_a_new_package_to_the_archive.3F
> - http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
> 
> What I did:
> 1. Sent ITP mail (#714453) to wnpp package.
> 2. Created package, and wrote "Close: #714453" in its changelog.
> 3. Uploaded my package to mentors.debian.net.
> 4. Enabled "Needs sponsorship".
> 5. Wrote RFS mail using examples from RFS template on mentros.debian.net.
> 6. Sent RFS mail (#714734) to sponsorship-requests package.
> 
> 7. Merged RFS (#714734 on sponsorship-requests) to ITP (#714453 on wnpp) to
>    close both tickets automatically if my package is uploaded by sponsor.
> 
> My fault step is not in 1-6?

1-6 are the right steps.

> Should I have asked sponsor to close RFS by hand instead of did 7?

Yes :-)

ITP is closed automatically because of step 2, but the RFS bug must be
closed by your sponsor.

Cheers!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: