Bug#712799: RFS: ctesf/1.0-1 ITP
(I don't indend to sponsor this package. Sorry!)
* tglman <tglman@tglman.com>, 2013-06-19, 18:21:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctesf/ctesf_1.0-1.dsc
We have already plenty of C++ testing frameworks in the archive:
cpputest, cxxtest, gtest, libtut, unittest++, cppunit...
How is ctesf better/different than them?
How was your orig.tar generated? It matches neither the one that uscan
download, nor the one get-orig-source generates...
Lintian emits:
W: ctesf-dbg: debug-file-with-no-debug-symbols usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libctesf-1.0.so
W: ctesf-dbg: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
W: ctesf-dbg: copyright-without-copyright-notice
W: ctesf-dbg: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory usr/share/doc/ctesf-dbg/copyright
W: ctesf: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/libctesf-1.0.so
I: ctesf: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/libctesf-1.0.so
W: ctesf: missing-depends-line
W: ctesf: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
W: ctesf: copyright-without-copyright-notice
I: ctesf: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
W: ctesf: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory usr/share/doc/ctesf/copyright
E: ctesf: sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname usr/lib/libctesf-1.0.so
W: ctesf-dev: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
W: ctesf-dev: copyright-without-copyright-notice
I: ctesf-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
W: ctesf-dev: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory usr/share/doc/ctesf-dev/copyright
Typos:
informantion -> information
Retrine -> Retrieve (?)
distructor -> destructor
contructor -> constructor
inizialization -> initialization
multile -> multiple
--
Jakub Wilk
Reply to: