[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#703730: marked as done (RFS: redeclipse/1.4-1 redeclipse-data/1.4-1)

Your message dated Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:18:18 +0100
with message-id <514DFFFA.9030109@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#703730: RFS: redeclipse/1.4-1 redeclipse-data/1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #703730,
regarding RFS: redeclipse/1.4-1 redeclipse-data/1.4-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
703730: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703730
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org
Thanks

Dear mentors and pkg-gamers,

I am looking for a sponsor for my updated packages "redeclipse" and "redeclipse-data":

* Package name    : redeclipse
  Version         : 0.4-1
  Upstream Author : Quinton "Quin" Reeves <qreeves@gmail.com>
                  : Lee "Eihrul" Salzman <lsalzman@gmail.com>
                  : Red Eclipse Team and others
* URL             : http://redeclipse.net
* License         : Zlib, CC-BY-SA-3.0+
  Section         : contrib/games

It builds those binary packages:

 redeclipse[-dbg] - multiplayer FPS game based on Cube2
 redeclipse-server[-dbg] - server for the Red Eclipse FPS game

Changelog:
redeclipse (1.4-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
  * Move server examples to /usr/share/games/doc/redeclipse/
  * Added screenshot URL for Ubuntu
  * Removed Enet from source package (unused)
  * Drop dpkg Pre-Depends (upgrades from old Ubuntu versions not relevant)
  * Include version.cfg in tarball, required for server

* Package name    : redeclipse-data
  Version         : 0.4-1
  Upstream Author : Red Eclipse Team and others
* URL             : http://redeclipse.net
* License         : CC_BY-SA-3.0+, Zlib and various
  Section         : non-free/games

It builds this binary package:

 redeclipse-data - data for the Red Eclipse FPS game

Changelog:
redeclipse-data (1.4-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
  * Drop dpkg Pre-Depends (upgrades from old Ubuntu versions not relevant)
  * Added more verbose notice why package is in non-free
  * Include license.txt files, in favour of maintaining data tree identical


The packages are up on mentors:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/redeclipse
 dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/r/redeclipse/redeclipse_1.4-1.dsc

(Note that the data package is ~625MB)
 http://mentors.debian.net/package/redeclipse-data
 dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/r/redeclipse-data/redeclipse-data_1.4-1.dsc


The packaging is done in git:

 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/redeclipse.git;a=summary
 git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-games/redeclipse.git

(Note that the data clone is ~780M)
 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/redeclipse-data.git;a=summary
 git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-games/redeclipse-data.git


Lintian:
N: The license is CC-BY-SA-3.0+, meaning "or later", albeit valid, is not a
N: recognised license shortname.
N: The stand-alone license paragraph has the standard CC-BY-SA-3.0 version.
O: redeclipse source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright cc-by-sa-3.0+ (paragraph at line 75)

# Should only be needed for upgrades from Ubuntu Lucid, where this package does not exist
P: redeclipse-server: data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends
P: redeclipse-server-dbg: data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends
P: redeclipse-dbg: data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends
P: redeclipse: data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends

# No it's not
I: redeclipse-server-dbg: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
I: redeclipse-dbg: extended-description-is-probably-too-short

# Used for Ubuntu Software Centre
I: redeclipse: unknown-field-in-control screenshot-url
I: redeclipse: unknown-field-in-control thumbnail-url


N: The license is CC-BY-SA-3.0+, meaning "or later", albeit valid, this is not a
N: recognised license shortname.
N: The stand-alone license paragraph has the standard CC-BY-SA-3.0 version.
O: redeclipse-data source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright cc-by-sa-3.0+ (paragraph at line 321)

# Should only be needed for upgrades from Ubuntu Lucid, where this package does not exist
P: redeclipse-data: data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends

# No it's not
I: redeclipse-data: extended-description-is-probably-too-short

N: These license files are kept in the data tree because:
N: * They are minimal in comparison to the rest of the content
N: * There is no good distinction between contents of files like readme.txt
N:   mapname.txt and license.txt, and some are useful
N: * This maintains the data tree idential to upstream
O: redeclipse-data: extra-license-file usr/share/games/redeclipse/data/crosshairs/license.txt
N: These license files are kept in the data tree because:
N: * They are minimal in comparison to the rest of the content
N: * There is no good distinction between contents of files like readme.txt
N:   mapname.txt and license.txt, and some are useful
N: * This maintains the data tree idential to upstream
O: redeclipse-data: extra-license-file usr/share/games/redeclipse/data/models/actors/turret/license.txt


I would be very happy if someone could review and/or upload this package for me.

Thanks!

-- 
Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

Thanks for you work. I've just uploaded both packages.

Regards,
Felix

--- End Message ---
Reply to: