[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#691893: marked as done (RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2)

Your message dated Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:22:31 +0000
with message-id <E1UILmZ-0005oW-GO@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #691893,
regarding RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
691893: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691893
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

  Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roundup". I have a dedicated
uploader (Toni Mueller), but another eye on my changes needn't hurt. It
fixes 3 outstanding bugs, one of which is an RC bug.

 * Package name    : roundup
   Version         : 1.4.20-2
   Upstream Author : roundup-devel@sourceforge.net
 * URL             : http://www.roundup-tracker.org/
 * License         : Zope Public License (ZPL) Version 2.0
   Section         : web

  It builds those binary packages:

    roundup    - Issue-tracking system in python

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/roundup


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roundup/roundup_1.4.20-2.dsc

  Regards,
   Kai Storbeck

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package roundup has been removed from mentors.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: