Bug#687563: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.0.3-1 [ITP] -- opengrm n-gram, library

[Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>]

(Sorry for the late reply. Somehow your mail fell through the cracks...)

* Giulio Paci <giuliopaci@gmail.com>, 2013-01-13, 13:56:
> > Would it be possible to exclude binary files from the being analysed 
> > by licensecheck?
> Done.

Now debian/source/include-binaries can be dropped.

> > Is there a reason you explicitly enable building static libraries?
> Just to mimic openfst.
> But I have to say that openfst upstream suggests static libraries for 
> performance reasons, while opengrm-ngram upstream suggests no static 
> libraries for compilation speed reasons.
> Do you prefer if I drop the static libraries?

If I were the maintainer, I wouldn't bother to enable them.
But I'm okay with keeping them, too.

Do you know how the files in src/testdata/* were generated? I wonder if 
we have the full source for it.

--
Jakub Wilk